Krywin v. Chicago Transit Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE O’BRIEN
delivered the opinion of the court:
The defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (the CTA), appeals the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Marianna Krywin, on her complaint for negligence and wilful and wanton conduct. The primary issue on appeal is whether the CTA breached its duty to provide plaintiff with a safe place to alight when it stopped its train in front of a natural accumulation of snow and ice, upon which plaintiff fell as she was exiting the train. We reverse.
At trial, Darren Hill testified that he has been a security controller with the CTA for 16 years.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Wade v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Serritos v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Shoemaker v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Lisowski v. MacNeal Memorial Hospital AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Doe-2 v. McLean County Unit District No. 5 Board of DirectorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Anderson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Anderson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Brown v. TurnerDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.