Nelson v. Dubose

Plaintiff appeals a judgment of no cause of action entered after a jury found that plaintiff had not suffered a serious impairment of body function. We affirm.

Defendant’s car rear-ended plaintiffs car while plaintiff was stopped at a red light. At the time of the accident, plaintiff believed that she was uninjured. But plaintiff later complained of shoulder, neck, and back *498pain. Both parties provided medical experts to present to the jury. The jury heard the facts of the case and the differing medical opinions on plaintiffs injuries. Plaintiff argued that she suffered injuries to her neck and…