Legal Opinion

Cobra Building & Development, Inc. v. City of Salem

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 1982No. 114704 CA A21381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiff (Cobra) brought this action to obtain from defendant (City) the amount of a waterline connection fee collected by City from a third party. The trial court awarded Cobra a money judgment on a theory of unjust enrichment. City appeals, and we reverse.

A preliminary issue concerns our scope of review. The complaint alleges that “[p]laintiff has no adequate remedy at law” and that defendant “has been unjustly enriched” and seeks a money judgment. The parties tried the case to the court sitting without a jury. Pursuant to ORCP 62A, the court made special findings of fact in support of its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Derenco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Fleming v. WinebergOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Lieuallen Land & Livestock Corp. v. HeidenrichOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wescold, Inc. v. Logan International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. MacLean & Associates, Inc. v. American Guaranty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Burt, Vetterlein & Bushnell, P.C. v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Ford v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Burt, Vetterlein & Bushnell, P.C. v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API