Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Park Lane Motors, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 4, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.
Defendants sought and were denied leave to serve an amended answer alleging as a second defense that a prior judgment precludes the prosecution of the causes of action herein.
*264The complaint alleges a claim for personal injuries and one for pecuniary damages resulting from the death of plaintiff’s intestate. The alleged injuries and death were consequent on the negligent operation on March 24, 1960 of an automobile owned by defendant Park Lane Motors, Inc. and operated by defendant Bernard Friedman, the son of plaintiff’s intestate. The proposed second defense is grounded on a prior action by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- New York State Labor Relations Board v. Holland Laundry, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Glaser v. HuetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Glaser v. HuetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Metro Foundation Contractors, Inc. v. Marco Martelli Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016