Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. 38 East 29 Street, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sidney H. Asch, J.
Plaintiff, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, moves for an order granting summary judgment in its favor, directly against the third-party defendants pursuant to section 29 of the Workers’ Compensation Law.
Plaintiff commenced this action to satisfy its workers’ compensation lien representing payments to third-party defendant Joseph Walsh, by suing defendants 38 East 29 Street, Inc., and Omnia Properties, Inc. Defendant 38 East 29 Street, Inc., commenced a third-party action against Joseph Walsh and Fuchsberg and Fuchsberg. Plaintiff then asserted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Castleberry v. Hudson Valley Asphalt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- O'CONNOR v. Lee-Hy Paving Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Cox v. Belmont Iron WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wood v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1984
- Di Meglio v. Hartford InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Smith v. SpinocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Emmett L. Turner v. City of Buffalo, Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Alleged Lienor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994