Legal Opinion

Lee v. Gidley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1949No. 7 Div. 999PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The plaintiff recovered of the defendant $500 damages on Count 3 of the complaint charging trespass to land and cutting timber. Counts 1 and 2 were in debt to recover the statutory penalty for cutting the timber (Code 1940, Title 47, § 272) but the jury made no return on these counts, so we consider only Count 3.

The proper measure of damages for a recovery under Count 3 (for trespass quare clausum fregit) is the difference in the value of the land immediately before and after the trespass. Granade v. United States Lumber & Cotton Co., 224 Ala. 185 (9), 139 So. 409; White v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Granade v. United States Lumber & Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Ford v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Gray v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Jefferson Lumber Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Loch Ridge Construction Company, Inc. v. BarraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Clark v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Dollar v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Bic Corp. v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API