Lee v. Gidley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The plaintiff recovered of the defendant $500 damages on Count 3 of the complaint charging trespass to land and cutting timber. Counts 1 and 2 were in debt to recover the statutory penalty for cutting the timber (Code 1940, Title 47, § 272) but the jury made no return on these counts, so we consider only Count 3.
The proper measure of damages for a recovery under Count 3 (for trespass quare clausum fregit) is the difference in the value of the land immediately before and after the trespass. Granade v. United States Lumber & Cotton Co., 224 Ala. 185 (9), 139 So. 409; White v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Granade v. United States Lumber & Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Ford v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Gray v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Jefferson Lumber Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Loch Ridge Construction Company, Inc. v. BarraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Clark v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Dollar v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Bic Corp. v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.