Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Marshall
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1920No. 10,605Published
From Franklin Circuit Court; Chester E. Roberts, Judge Pro Tern. Action between Edgar S. Marshall and Elizabeth Marshall. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, P. J.
The only question presented for our consideration on this appeal relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of the trial court.'
There is evidence in the record to support said finding, and, while some of the evidence is conflicting, we are not required to weigh it. The finding and judgment of the trial court is conclusive thereon. Ruoff v. Dowerman (1919), 69 Ind. App. 460, 122 N. E. 361; Dannhauer v. Young (1919), 73 Ind. App. 651, 122 N. E. 589; Fisher v. Carey (1918), 67 Ind. App. 438, 119 N. E. 376.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fisher v. CareyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Dannhauer v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ruoff v. DowermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919