Legal Opinion

Dannhauer v. Young

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1919No. 9,694PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Wells Circuit Court; William H. Eichhorn, Judge. Action by Harry J. Young and another against Margaret Dannhauer and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Action by Harry J. Young and wife against the appellants and others to reform a contract for the sale of certain real estate situated in Huntington county, Indiana, for the specific performance of the same when reformed, tú quiet title to said real estate and for ejectment. The complaint is in three paragraphs. Appellants, after filing their answers, filed a *652cross-complaint in two paragraphs against the appellees and Ross O. Kaylor, wherein the appellants alleged that the contract had been obtained by fraud; that Kaylor and the other defendants claimed some interest in said real estate, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Snyder v. BunnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dannhauer v. KaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Marshall v. MarshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API