Cabrera v. Cabrera

I must respectfully disagree with the view of the majority sustaining the court’s granting of the plaintiff’s motion in limine, for any one of the three following reasons: (1) the court assumed facts not in evidence in ruling on the plaintiff’s motion; (2) the plaintiffs psychological condition was first introduced by her own claim; and (3) the releases that were signed by the plaintiff waived any psychologist-patient privilege that may have existed.

I

On August 9,1989, after the plaintiff presented witnesses and concluded her case, she filed, served on the defendant’s counsel without prior…