Alfred Ralph Petrone v. Audrey Kaslow

Petrone filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus contending that the Parole Commission’s decision to continue further consideration of his parole beyond the one-third point of his eight-year sentence (18 U.S.C. § 4205(b)(2)) denied him meaningful consideration.

Petitioner’s contention that the Parole Commission’s determination frustrated the sentencing court’s intent has been rejected by the Supreme Court in United States v. Addonizio, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2235, 60 L.Ed.2d 805 (1979). Even if the sentencing judge’s expectations were frustrated by the Parole Commission’s extension of time…