State v. Ibarra-Ruiz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for hindering prosecution and conspiracy to commit murder. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in admitting testimony of a police officer concerning statements that defendant made to the officer through interpreters. He also challenges the trial court’s ranking at sentencing of his conviction for conspiracy to commit murder as a level 11 offense under the sentencing guidelines based on what he asserts were aggravating factors that were not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.
Shortly after a fatal drive-by shooting, a surviving…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Roble-BakerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. BementCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- State v. Aguirre-AyonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013