People v. Jordan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Since defendant never challenged during the suppression hearing the propriety of his waiver of the Miranda rights with respect to the first statement made to Detective McGuiness, that issue has not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011; People v Harris, 79 AD2d 615).
Moreover, there is ample credible evidence in the record to establish that defendant’s brother, who spoke the same language and dialect as defendant, twice translated the Miranda rights from English into Serbo-Croatian before any statement was made. Approximately three and one-half…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. TuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. GlinsmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. CongilaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. ThomchesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. SirnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.