Legal Opinion

Whitcomb v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1890No. 13,835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This was a suit between the heirs at law of James Smith, deceased, for partition between them of the lands of which he died the owner. Other persons were made parties for the purpose of settling the title to a small portion — fourteen acres — of said land. The appellees William H. Smith and Claudius Smith were made defendants, and filed a cross-complaint, alleging that William H. Smith is a grandson of said James Smith, deceased, he being the only child and heir at law of William Smith, who was a son of said James Smith, deceased, and that said William died before the death of said James;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kealing v. VansickleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Bartholomew v. PiersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Locke v. Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Davis v. FranklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Tousey v. LockwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Relender v. State ex rel. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Talbott v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Taylor v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Harris v. RiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Horn v. LuptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API