Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Overman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1972No. 7215SC341Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Appellant assigns as error the Court’s conclusion that the Clerk did not have jurisdiction to appoint Craven as Administrator d/b/n of Overman’s estate, and that Nationwide had standing to challenge his appointment. In 34 C.J.S., Executors and Administrators, § 1018, it is stated:

“To warrant the appointment of an administrator de bonis non, it is absolutely essential that the previous incumbency should have actually ended, and, if there is no vacancy, the appointment is void for lack of jurisdiction.”

In 21 Am. Jur., Executors and Administrators, § 774, it is stated:

“To warrant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. High v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. High v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Springer v. . ShavenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Edwards v. . McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API