Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Steinagel

District Court, D. Utah

Decided August 8, 2012No. Case No. 2:11CV379 DSPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVID SAM, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Jestina Sunkarie BanguraClayton does African hair braiding. She does not use heat or chemicals or cut hair. She has been braiding hair for years, and she wants to be able to charge for her services. The State of Utah, however, says that Justina is a cosmetologist, and as such, cannot legally braid hair for money unless she spends thousands of dollars for hundreds of hours of classes that have nothing to do with her occupation of natural braiding. Plaintiff filed this suit, arguing that Utah’s cosmetology/barber…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Altagracia Sanchez v. Office of the State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  2. Brantley v. KuntzDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
  3. Martinez v. MullenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  4. Niang v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  5. Waugh v. Nevada State Board of CosmetologyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API