Legal Opinion

People v. Visel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936No. Docket No. 121, Calendar No. 38,689PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant was convicted of an assault upon a girl, 13 years of age, and taking indecent and improper liberties with her person, and prosecutes review by appeal.

Under the conviction the lesser offense of assault was merged in the major crime. The court instructed the jury:

“I imagine that I can believe that a man would put his arm around a child, a girl of the age of Florence Cotton, with intent to take indecent liberties. He is guilty the minute he touches her, of the offense. It rests with Ms intent. What does he intend to do? These crimes are effected by beginning rather subtly and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. HealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. People v. DupreeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. PlaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. LiggettMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. TownesMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API