Legal Opinion

United States v. Rogers

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 9, 2014No. 13 CR 952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge:

Defendants Eric Rogers (“Rogers”) and Eric Curtis (“Curtis”) (collectively “Defendants”) seek to suppress electronic location evidence collected from Defendants’ cell phones. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

For the purposes of providing context to the Defendants’ motion to suppress we rely on the allegations contained in the criminal complaint and indictment filed against Defendants. The Defendants do not contest: (1) that the government had probable cause to believe that they were involved in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. LangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API