Legal Opinion

Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 27, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02787Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Cynthi a Clark, ) No. CV-18-02787-PHX-SPL ) 9 ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER vs. ) ) 11 ) Commissioner of Social Security ) 12 Administration, ) 13 ) ) 14 Defendant. ) 15 Plaintiff Cynthia Clark seeks judicial review of the denial of her application for 16 disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff 17 argues that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred by according inadequate weight 18 to Plaintiff’s treating physicians and by rejecting her subjective complaints (Doc.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API