Legal Opinion
Kyle v. Reynolds
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 28, 1912PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
The plaintiffs took numerous exceptions to the master’s report; but they have argued only the question of their right, as a right, to have the bill dismissed without prejudice on payment of costs, pursuant to the motion made by them. We therefore treat all the exceptions to the master’s report as waived.
- The case was sent to a master * on October 4,1909. Between June 27, 1910, and December 5, 1910, numerous hearings were had. On January 14, 1911, a draft copy of the report was read to counsel after due notice, “and suggestions and alterations were then and there considered.” The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Union Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dean v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Foxborough Water Supply DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Earl Carpenter & Sons Co. v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- C. A. Briggs Co. v. National Wafer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.