Legal Opinion

Partain v. Maddox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 23, 1974No. 49152PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

1. "As a general rule 'the failure of a public officer to comply with the laws governing and regulating his powers and duties. . .usually subjects such officer to a civil action for damages.’ 22 R. C. L. 478. It is a well-established principle that a public official who fails to perform purely ministerial duties required by law is subject to an action for damages by one who is injured by his omission. However, it is equally well established that 'where an officer is invested with discretion and is empowered to exercise his judgment in matters brought before him, he is sometimes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Amy v. The SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. City of Atlanta v. HollidaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Vickers v. MotteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Hudspeth v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Merrow v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Lathrop v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. Swofford v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Christensen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API