Legal Opinion
Norman v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 11, 2005No. CIV.A.04-1208(EGS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is plaintiff John D. Norman’s Motion to Reconsider and Reinstate his civil action for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). Because the Court is persuaded that reinstatement would ultimately be futile given plaintiffs failure to exhaust his FTCA administrative remedies within the congressionally mandated limitations period, plaintiffs motion will be DENIED. See Lepkowski v. United State Dep’t of Treasury, 804 F.2d 1310, 1314 (D.C.Cir.1986)(motions for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) are not to be granted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jeanina Celestine v. Mount Vernon Neighborhood Health Center, United States of America, No. 04-0839-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Edward Spannaus v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Chung v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Norman, John D. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Norris v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. 8 Gilcrease LaneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- American United Transportation Inc. v. Western Regional UnionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Bledsoe v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.