Legal Opinion

Andrew Flowers v. Michael Fair

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 8, 1982No. 82-1050PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Andrew Flowers appeals from the denial by the district court of his petition for habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He asserts that his constitutional rights to a speedy trial and to effective assistance of counsel were violated in his 1976 trial in a Massachusetts superior court for the armed robbery of a Radio Shack store. We affirm the district court’s decision.

While it is true that 19 months passed between Flowers’s indictment and his final trial, the district court found, based upon a careful review of the record, that this was not caused by deliberate delay on the part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ronald Maynard v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. Stanley David Peters v. Raymond L. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. United States v. MalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API