Andrew Flowers v. Michael Fair
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Andrew Flowers appeals from the denial by the district court of his petition for habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He asserts that his constitutional rights to a speedy trial and to effective assistance of counsel were violated in his 1976 trial in a Massachusetts superior court for the armed robbery of a Radio Shack store. We affirm the district court’s decision.
While it is true that 19 months passed between Flowers’s indictment and his final trial, the district court found, based upon a careful review of the record, that this was not caused by deliberate delay on the part…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ronald Maynard v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Stanley David Peters v. Raymond L. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United States v. MalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993