Legal Opinion

Furr's Supermarkets, Inc. v. Bethune

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2001No. 00-0846Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

53 S.W.3d 375 (2001)

FURR'S SUPERMARKETS, INC., Petitioner,

v.

Marthana BETHUNE, Respondent.

No. 00-0846.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Submitted April 18, 2001.

Decided June 28, 2001.

Mark C. Walker, Steven L. Hughes, Mounce Green Myers Safi & Galatzan, El Paso, petitioner.

Dennis L. Richard, Richard Cobb & Hall, El Paso, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · EnochJustice Enoch

In this case the trial court did not assess court costs against Marthana Bethune, the losing party, and for Furr's, the prevailing party, as Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 131 requires.[1] The trial court relied on Rule 141, which permits a "good cause" exception to Rule 131…

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API