Legal Opinion
In Re the Complaint of Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 20, 1990No. 89-1835-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCOTT, District Judge.
This Cause is before the Court upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The petitioner, Anheuser-Busch Incorporated (“ANHEUSER-BUSCH”), has' instituted this action pursuant to the Limitation of Liability Act. 46 U.S.C.App. 181-188 (1958) (originally enacted as Act of Mar. 3, 1851 ch. 43, sec. 3, 9 stat. 635). In essence, Anheuser-Busch claims that this Act entitles it to a limitation of liability for the damages arising from a July 26, 1987 boat ing accident. The claimants,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Guzman v. PichiriloSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bernard E. Keiser v. Coliseum Properties, Inc., A. Don Fleck v. Auditing Services, Inc., H. G. Lortscher v. Auditing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- American Car & Foundry Co. v. BrassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re American Milling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
- In Re the Complaint of MartellDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990