Legal Opinion

Gluck v. Chashin

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 27, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from the denial by the Court of Chancery of the individual defendants’ motion to vacate the sequestration of shares of stock in Delaware corporations.

This is a derivative stockholders’ action in which jurisdiction over the individual defendants was sought through sequestration. Purportedly seized by the ex parte order of sequestration were shares in the A. S. Beck Shoe Corporation registered in the names of the defendants, Gluck and Schiff; 109 shares of Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Long Island, Inc. registered in the name of the defendant, Johnston,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  2. Sands v. Lefcourt Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  3. Breech v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  4. In Re Estate of KlingamanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nickson v. Filtrol CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1970
  2. Gluck v. ChashinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Yancey v. EI duPONT De NEMOURS AND COMPANYCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API