Legal Opinion
Palermo v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided March 6, 1997No. 95-P-1690PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.
Prescinding from the numerous procedural irregularities that have characterized the entire course of this lengthy litigation, which we shall largely ignore, we glean *284from the jumbled record the following facts requisite to a decision of this appeal. In the early 1970’s, Dorothy and Charlene Theresa Frew, next door neighbors of Thomas and Elizabeth Palermo, ran a noisome and noisy dog grooming business out of their home in Chicopee. During that time, the Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (Fireman’s) provided the Frews with a homeowner’s liability policy, which included an endorsement covering…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Swift v. Fitchburg Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Peabody Essex Museum, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Peterborough Oil Co. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.