Swift v. Fitchburg Mutual Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.
We hold that the defendant insurer under a homeowners policy was in breach of the contract and, the “criminal acts” exclusion being inapplicable, is liable for expenses incurred by the insured in responding to a third-party suit and for the amount of the judgment against the insured in that suit.
*618 NARRATIVE
1. On February 12, 1994, the plaintiff Anne Francis (then seventy-seven years old) and her daughter, the plaintiff Carolyn Swift, were at their home in Rehoboth. Ralph Goff, Jr., forty-one years old, had driven to their house in his truck that morning and was asked in for lunch. (Goff’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Littlefield v. Acadia InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Allstate Insurance v. BarronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Creasy v. RuskIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Siebe, Inc. v. Louis M. Gerson Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.