Legal Opinion
Liebling v. Barbara Building & Development Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided August 7, 1931No. 1639PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RITTER, District Judge.
The declaration in this cause is upon a promissory note given the plaintiff by the defendant, which is due and unpaid.
The defendant has filed its sole plea as follows: “For a plea to the declaration herein says that after the alleged claim accrued and before this suit the plaintiff by deed released the defendant therefrom.” This is .good as to form.
The defendant filed a motion for judgment because the plaintiff has failed to file a replication thereto on or before the requisite rule day, but such motion is inconsequential under section 4284, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Hanna v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- The People v. . McCumberNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reyes ex rel. Barcenas v. RoushDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012