Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reyes ex rel. Barcenas v. Roush

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 17, 2012No. 2D11-4490Published

1ConcurrenceAltenbernd, Judge

I fully concur in the court’s opinion. The fact that Ms. Barcenas contacted a *592law firm within a few months of this child’s birth to determine whether he had suffered an injury as a result of malpractice suggests that the lawsuit filed more than five years after the child’s birth is probably barred by the statute of limitations. This cannot, however, be established from the face of the record on a motion to dismiss. If this type of injury can occur from natural causes at the time of birth and is not necessarily caused by malpractice, it is at least conceivable that the malpractice could not be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meadows v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. In re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1967 RevisionSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  3. Lomas v. West Palm Beach Water Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Cromer v. MullallyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Furst v. BlackmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API