Legal Opinion
Sundance Associates, Inc. v. Reno
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1998No. 96-1501PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
The Attorney General and the United States Department of Justice (“the government”) appeal the United States District Court for the District of Colorado’s award of summary judgment for Sundance Associates (“Sundance”), holding 28 C.F.R. § 75.1(c)(4)(iii) is an invalid implementation of 18 U.S.C. § 2257. This court assumes jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirms.
Concerned about the exploitation of children by pornographers, Congress enacted the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act of 1988, Pub.L. No. 100-690, Title VII, § 7513(a), 102 Stat. 4187,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Connection Distributing Co. v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGHCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Jurasek v. Utah State HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Office of Thrift Supervision v. Overland Park Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.