Legal Opinion

Bealmear v. Hildebrand

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1920No. 22,968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Gray district court; Littleton M. Day, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by taxpayers to enjoin the county superintendent from calling an election in a rural high-school district, to choose a board of officers. A demurrer to the petition was sustained, and the plaintiffs appeal.

The petition discloses that persons living at and near Ensign, in Gray county, close to the Ford county line, promoted organization of a rural high-school district composed of territory lying in both counties. A petition was circulated and signed before boundaries of the proposed district were approved by the county…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Duggan v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Horner v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Miely v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. School District No. 38 v. Rural High School District No. 6Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Euler v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Elting v. CloustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API