Legal Opinion

Horner v. City of Atchison

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1914No. 19,084PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Atchison district court; William A. Jackson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff sued the city for damages for personal injuries resulting from the collapse of a bridge. The city defended on the ground that the bridge was not within the city limits. The defendant prevailed and the plaintiff appeals.

*558The bridge spanned White Clay creek and was carried on the county records as bridge number 81 on road number 59. According to the terms of an ordinance passed in 1890, defining the boundaries of the city, a street designated as Thirteenth street formed the western boundary of the city at the locality in question.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Dawson v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Chaves v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Babcock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Fairfax Drainage District v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Mason v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Truck-Trailer Supply Co. Inc. v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Atchison & Eastern Bridge Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API