Webster v. Krizan

¶1 These consolidated appeals present two issues following our remand in Webster v. Krizan , No. 2016AP25, unpublished slip op. (WI App Mar. 28, 2017) (hereinafter, Krizan I ). In that decision, we held that Chad and Brenda Webster's offer to purchase certain of Daniel, Beverly, Scott and Dale Krizan's farm property held priority over a subsequent offer to purchase the same property by Travis and Ronald Krizan.1 Id. , ¶8. In so holding, we rejected the Intervening Krizans' unjust enrichment argument, noting the circuit court's order required both that the closing on the Websters' offer…