Legal Opinion
Cummiskey v. Chandris, S.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1989No. 87 Civ. 3319(IBC)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, contending there are no genuine issues of material fact for trial. Plaintiff opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion of defendants is granted in its entirety.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff Shirley Cummiskey commenced this personal injury action in New York State Supreme Court to recover damages for an injury incurred while a passenger on board defendants’ vessel, the S/S BRITANIS. Defendant operator Chandris, S.A. and defendant vessel…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Krynski v. ChaseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Shirley Cummiskey v. Chandris, S.A. And Ajax Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Jackson v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Hesterly v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- McDonough v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.