Legal Opinion

Brillon Ex Rel. Brillon v. Klein Independent School District

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 8, 2003No. CIV.A.H-02-16325PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

RAINEY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Tax Costs (Dkt.# 42) and Plaintiffs’ Application for Costs and Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt.# 43). After consideration of the parties’ arguments and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Tax Costs should be GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ Application for Costs and Attorneys’ Fees should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as explained below.

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiffs brought this lawsuit against Defendant as an appeal of the decision of a special education…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Jason D. W., by Next Friend Mr. & Mrs. Douglas W. v. Houston Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pearl Murphy, Theodore Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of Education, No. 03-7850-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Gross Ex Rel. Gross v. Perrysburg Exempted Village School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API