Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2005No. 15S00-0109-DP-393PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

Tommy Pruitt was charged with the murder of Deputy Daniel Starnes of the Morgan County Sheriff's Department. The prosecutor sought the death penalty based on the fact that the victim was a law enforcement officer killed in the course of his duties. Pruitt sought to have the death penalty charge dismissed on the ground that he is mentally retarded and therefore ineligible for the death penalty. The trial court denied the motion, and a jury subsequently convicted Pruitt and recommended death. The trial court imposed that sentence. We conclude that the trial court's finding that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Randy L. Knapp v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. Carl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API