Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Presbyterian Church of Albany v. Cooper, 112 N. Y. 517; Baird v. Baird, 145 id. 659; Hocking Valley R. Co. v. Barbour, 192 App. Div. 654; Strobe v. Netherland Co., 245 id. 573.) All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Fuller v. Artman (69 Hun, 546). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action by assignee of an option to compel sale of oil property.) Present—Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [156 Misc. 750.]

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Presb. Church of Albany v. . CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Fuller v. ArtmanNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. BarbourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Cochran v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1935