Legal Opinion

Bradley Grinding MacHine Corp. v. Bradley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1947No. Docket No. 16, Calendar No. 43,249PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, C. J.

This is an action for an accounting and for injunctive relief. Plaintiff corporation was organized in 1942,. for the purpose of manufacturing light grinding machines. The sole stockholder was, and is, George Bradley, who is the son of the defendant Leonard G. Bradley. Said defendant was at the time operating a business under the name of Bradley Machinery Company at 211 Joseph Campau avenue in the city of Detroit. Plaintiff rented from defendant Bradley a portion of the space at said address for the purpose of conducting its business. It was also agreed that defendant Bradley should have the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Langdell v. LangdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Clement v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wolff v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hillier v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API