Legal Opinion
Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department v. RAM Outdoor Advertising
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided December 16, 2015No. CV-15-404PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
- BART F. VIRDEN, Judge
| Appellee RAM Outdoor Advertising (RAM) received a conditional-use permit from the City of Fort Smith'-to convert an existing billboard along Interstate Highway 540 from a static display to a digital display. RAM then applied for a permit from appellant;'the'Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department (the Department or AHTD), to convert the sign to an electronic message device (EMD). The Department denied the application, and RAM requested an administrative hearing before the Arkansas State Highway Commission (the agency). The hearing officer upheld the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Pegasus Renovation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Yarbrough v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Files v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Alper v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department v. KidderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arkansas State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers & Professional Surveyors v. CallicottCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Gildehaus v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Lauren Duensing v. Arkansas State Medical BoardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
- Arkansas State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers & Professional Surveyors v. CallicottCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Capitol Zoning Dist. Comm'n v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.