Breckbill v. Turnpike Company
Supreme Court of the United States
THIS was an action of Indebitatus -djfumpfit. The caufe was tried at Lancajier, and the J ury found a fpecial ver-ditt in the following terms: “ The Jury find, that B. Breckbill, the Plaintiff, was feized in his demefne as of fee in 216 acres of land, &c. “ That the Prefident, Managers &c.
Read the full summary
THIS was an action of Indebitatus -djfumpfit. The caufe was tried at Lancajier, and the J ury found a fpecial ver-ditt in the following terms: “ The Jury find, that B. Breckbill, the Plaintiff, was feized in his demefne as of fee in 216 acres of land, &c. “ That the Prefident, Managers &c. (the Defendants) by and- with their fuperintendants, furveyors, engineers, artifts and chain bearers, workmen and labourers, with their tools &c. entered in and upon the faid trail of land, and laid out a road in through and over the fame, 50 feet wide, and about 150 perches,in length, and caufed 21 feet…
1Opinion of the Court
The Court,
on the day fucceeding the argument, delivered an unanimous opinion, that on this fpecial verdiil, the' Plaintiff could not recover, in the prefent form of aition, a-gainft the Defendants, as a corporation: And, therefore, they deemed it unneceffary to decide the other queftions in the' caufe. •
Judgment for the Defendants.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Smoot v. Mayor of WetumpkaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- In Re Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of O'ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'ReillyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- O'Reilly v. Hickory on the Green Homeowners Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.