Heirs of Ludlow v. Kidd's Executors
Ohio Supreme Court
*This cause was adjourned here for decision from Hamilton county. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.. It was argued by Garrard, Hammond, and Storer, for the complainants, and by Fox, Caswell, and Starr, and N. Wright, for the-respondents. The court having embodied a brief notice of the arguments in the opinion, they are omitted.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court, by
Judge Sherman:
The complainants, the heirs at law of Israel Ludlow, deceased in 1811, being then infants,'filed their bill against Kidd and Williams, to obtain the legal title to a-lot in the city of Cincinnati. In 1817, the Supreme Court, upon the hearing, dismissed the bill upon the merits, the plaintiffs still continuing minors. In 1825, and within the time allowed them by statute, alter attaining full ager *510they filed their bill of review, upon the hearing of which the decree •of dismissal was reversed, and the cause continued for hearing. In 1827, after the decree…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Murray v. LylburnNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
3Cited by12 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Treinish v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. (In Re Periandri)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Dunfee v. ChildsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Mach v. BlanchardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Perkins v. PfalzgraffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.