Legal Opinion

Yarbrough v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1985No. S.F. 24698PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

Introduction

In 1976 we decided in Payne v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.3d 908 [132 Cal.Rptr. 405, 553 P.2d 565], that as a matter of due process and equal protection under both the federal and California Constitutions an indigent prisoner who is a defendant in “a bona fide legal action threatening his interests” is entitled to access to the courts to be heard in his defense. We left to the trial court’s discretion how access is to be achieved in particular cases, recognizing that, at times, appointment of counsel may be the only alternative. We made it clear, however, that the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Wantuch v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Cunningham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Piper v. PoppWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API