Yarbrough v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, J.
Introduction
In 1976 we decided in Payne v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.3d 908 [132 Cal.Rptr. 405, 553 P.2d 565], that as a matter of due process and equal protection under both the federal and California Constitutions an indigent prisoner who is a defendant in “a bona fide legal action threatening his interests” is entitled to access to the courts to be heard in his defense. We left to the trial court’s discretion how access is to be achieved in particular cases, recognizing that, at times, appointment of counsel may be the only alternative. We made it clear, however, that the trial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Wantuch v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Cunningham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Piper v. PoppWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.