Legal Opinion
Nicholson v. H. Poehler Co.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided November 10, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, District Judge
(in memorandum). I have determined the issues in Charles L. Nicholson v. H. Poehler Company, in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff.
The provisions of the statutes of this state, and especially of sections 9751, 9753, 9754, 9758, and 9760, define the rights, duties, and obligations of warehousemen. I can find no basis in the decisions of this state or the decisions of the state of North Dakota construing similar provisions, for a construction of the rights and obligations of warehousemen,.that justify the contention of the plaintiff in this case. In the light of the decision of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Bank v. Minneapolis & Northern Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Hall v. PillsburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Marshall v. AndrewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- National Bank of Wheaton v. ElkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co. v. DawsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoven v. McCarthy Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Kastner v. AndrewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Nieter v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Torgerson v. Quinn-Shepherdson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- South Dakota Wheat Growers' Ass'n v. Farmers' Grain Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931