Legal Opinion

Hall v. Pillsbury

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1890PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by defendants, partners as C. A. Pillsbury & Co., from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hicks, J., presiding, overruling their demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint. From the complaint it appears, in brief, that the firm of Gr. W. Ehle & Co. operated and conducted, for the storage of grain, a grain warehouse at Stewart, in this state. Fifteen different owners of grain, plaintiff being one of them, deposited at different times with said Ehle & Co., in said warehouse, for storage, different quantities of wheat, the aggregate amount so deposited being 2,647 35-60 bushels, and upon each of such deposits each depositor received from Ehle & Co. the usual warehouse or elevator receipt for the amount so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leuthold v. FairchildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. National Exchange Bank v. WilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kastner v. AndrewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Herrick v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Gordon v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Nieter v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. United States v. Haddix & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API