Legal Opinion

Dailey Law Firm, P.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Company

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 5, 2023No. 2:23-cv-10535Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION THE DAILEY LAW FIRM, P.C., Plaintiff, Case No. 23-10535 v. Hon. Denise Page Hood THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO 12(b)(6) [ECF NO. 2] I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court is Defendant’s, Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America (“Travelers”), Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s, The Dailey Law Firm, P.C.’s (“Dailey”), Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [ECF No.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Saginaw Cty. v. STAT Emergency Med. Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API