Legal Opinion

Diggs v. Siomporas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1968No. [No. 69, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

The somewhat unusual question presented by this appeal is whether the prospective purchasers of a lot of land under an option may waive a defect in the title and compel conveyance of the land subject to the flaw on the refusal of the record titleholder to execute a deed. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County decreed specific performance and the purported seller appealed. The optionor-appellant is Charles Diggs and the optionees-appellees are Thomas J. Siomporas and Burton Hazel.

The optionees, who were interested in either of two lots in a development known as “Woodland,” engaged a real…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Blondell v. TuroverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  3. Westpark, Inc. v. Seaton Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Medoff v. VandersaalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Messina v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Ollie v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Straley v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. David A. Bramble, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Selig v. State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API