United States v. Branum
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge:
Defendant Ronald Lynn Branum moves to dismiss the indictment against him and vacate his plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 12(b)(2). Branum claims that this federal prosecution is barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment because of a prior state civil forfeiture pursued by Multnomah County in a separate proceeding.
BACKGROUND FACTS
I adopt the facts I found in the earlier suppression hearing based on Branum’s claim of illegal search and seizure. The facts are succinctly set out in the United States’ brief, as summarized below.
I.Br…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Guy Jerome UrseryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SherrettDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
- United States v. BrophilDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1995
- United States v. BradfordDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1995
- United States v. LaneDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.