Legal Opinion
Peat Marwick Main v. Haass
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided June 28, 1989No. 04-88-00199-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REEVES, Justice.
Main Hurdman — now Peat, Marwick, Main & Company — an accounting firm, brought suit against Lawrence F. Haass to recover reimbursement fees, merger acquisition costs, and other damages that allegedly resulted when Haass breached a partnership agreement with Main Hurdman. Haass counter-claimed, seeking the value of his capital account and attorney fees. After a jury trial, judgment was entered denying recovery to Main Hurdman and awarding Haass his capital account and attorney fees. Main Hurdman timely perfected this appeal. The judgment of the trial court is reversed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. HaassTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- First City National Bank of Midland v. Concord Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- OKC Corp. v. UPG, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- OKC Corp. v. UPG, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.