Carll v. Terminix International Co., LP
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtDel Sole, P.J.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from a trial court order which denied Appellant’s Petition to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Judicial Proceedings. 1 We affirm.
¶ 2 This action was instituted by Appel-lees, Mr. and Mrs. Carll and their four children, claiming that they sustained numerous severe and permanent injuries as a result of Appellants’ negligent application of pesticides in and around their home. Appellee also sought damages for the costs of relocating as well as punitive damages. In response Appellants tiled a Petition to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Judicial Proceedings in which they asserted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Lobianco v. Property Protection, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Messa v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Fellerman, S. v. PECO Energy Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Peltz Ex Rel. Estate of Peltz v. SEARS, ROEBUCKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. AbnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
- Narayan v. The Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.