Legal Opinion

Narayan v. The Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2015No. SCWC-12-0000819PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

In this appeal we address whether the plaintiffs, a group of individual condominium owners, can be compelled to arbitrate claims arising from financial problems at a Maui condominium project. We hold that because the condominium owners did not unambiguously assent to arbitration, the purported agreement to arbitrate is unenforceable. We also address the doctrine of unconscionability-

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual History

This case arose from the financial breakdown of a Maui condominium development formerly known as the Rite-Carlton Club & Residences at Kapalua Bay…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Narayan v. The Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Narayan v. Association of Apartment Owners of Kapalua Bay Condominium.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Narayan v. Marriott International, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Nath v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Timika Rayford v. American House Roseville I LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API