Narayan v. The Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
NAKAYAMA, J.
In this appeal we address whether the plaintiffs, a group of individual condominium owners, can be compelled to arbitrate claims arising from financial problems at a Maui condominium project. We hold that because the condominium owners did not unambiguously assent to arbitration, the purported agreement to arbitrate is unenforceable. We also address the doctrine of unconscionability-
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual History
This case arose from the financial breakdown of a Maui condominium development formerly known as the Rite-Carlton Club & Residences at Kapalua Bay…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Narayan v. The Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Narayan v. Association of Apartment Owners of Kapalua Bay Condominium.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Narayan v. Marriott International, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Nath v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Timika Rayford v. American House Roseville I LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2025